Silly just found out, while his soul was hovering over the 300 Spartan men fighting Xerxes and all of those who are ugly from the East that this site was nominated as blogger's choice awards, by one person. Silly extols the beautiful icon on this website, but at the same time, asks all readers to go to the website and nominate themselves for a treat.
I didn't see "No, and slit the Bill sponsor’s bag and run his leg through it". That would be a good 4th no option.
Okay, Okay, so the Congressional version is sponsored by a woman (nothing wrong with that, as is often pointed out at this blog) but she still may have a bag worth slitting.
Another option might be "No, but toss Pete A. that delegate seat so he can get off life support".
1. No. We should move to anull the covenant. 2. No. We should align ourselves with Taiwan. (They need the support...we need the money) 3. No. We should align ourselves with Russia. (Perks-more Russian babes) 4. No. We should fight the good fight. 5. No. Now is not the time to cut and run. What we need to do now is increase support against a takeover. A NO surge. For awhile anyways, until we come to the realization it's a losing battle... oh wait.. that's Iraq... sorry.
No. Because the security of an enlarged military presence on Guam supercedes our livelihoods.
No. Because we should not stare Al Stayman's vengeance in the face.
No. Because the influx of stateside tourists that will pour in when the federal takeover happens will be far too much of a strain on our infrastructure.
No. Because we won't be able to adjust to the incredible "flexibility" of the federal government.
No. Because god helps those who help themselves... and our federal god should help us by not helping us. get it?
20 comments:
Silly just found out, while his soul was hovering over the 300 Spartan men fighting Xerxes and all of those who are ugly from the East that this site was nominated as blogger's choice awards, by one person. Silly extols the beautiful icon on this website, but at the same time, asks all readers to go to the website and nominate themselves for a treat.
that was indeed silly. was for fun though but was silly, just silly, silly. was inspired by sblogger.
love the new poll from my new place in paupau...
this poll is weighted in favor of yes votes... 4 "yes" versions and only 3 "no" versions
well, i hope it won't affect the votes though. what kind of psychological theory would you align with this?
I didn't see "No, and slit the Bill sponsor’s bag and run his leg through it". That would be a good 4th no option.
Okay, Okay, so the Congressional version is sponsored by a woman (nothing wrong with that, as is often pointed out at this blog) but she still may have a bag worth slitting.
Another option might be "No, but toss Pete A. that delegate seat so he can get off life support".
haha. Tnx for the tip.
here are a few more...
1. No. We should move to anull the covenant.
2. No. We should align ourselves with Taiwan. (They need the support...we need the money)
3. No. We should align ourselves with Russia. (Perks-more Russian babes)
4. No. We should fight the good fight.
5. No. Now is not the time to cut and run. What we need to do now is increase support against a takeover. A NO surge. For awhile anyways, until we come to the realization it's a losing battle... oh wait.. that's Iraq... sorry.
:)
No.Because I'd like to change rules in the middle of the game.
No. Because Section 503 of the covenant was not explained to me when my folks voted to have US passports.
No. Because my neighbor were ecstatic when they got and they can go to Guam, Hawaii and the US mainland just like the Guamanians.
No. Because of SPAM over atulai.
No. Period!
continued....
No. Because the security of an enlarged military presence on Guam supercedes our livelihoods.
No. Because we should not stare Al Stayman's vengeance in the face.
No. Because the influx of stateside tourists that will pour in when the federal takeover happens will be far too much of a strain on our infrastructure.
No. Because we won't be able to adjust to the incredible "flexibility" of the federal government.
No. Because god helps those who help themselves... and our federal god should help us by not helping us. get it?
oh wait...one more
NO! because if Sand is for it... you know it's gotta be wrong! ;)
i am but a cucumber at paupau...
;-) u r brad. cutecumber-some.
Why do the percentages add up to 111.5% ?
I'm all for yes.
votes are at least two. Some just click once. The percentage is according to total numbr of votes for each answer. Tnx.
That's fuzzy math!
Sounds like government social programs math.
hate math. hate government too. Fuzzy eh?
At least this blog allows anonymous posts!
Keep it up, Middle Road, even if the non-hacker does take you off his favorites list.
ur velcum nony!
Post a Comment